Search Results for "transit camp"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "transit camp"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Construction of Transit Camps on Reserved Land in Violation of MRTP Act. Construction on Land Reserved for Playground and Primary School Under Development Plan Held Illegal Despite Being Part of JNNURM Project.

28 Jun 2013

The petitioners, residents of Ulhasnagar, challenged resolutions of the Standing Committee and General Body of the Ulhas Nagar Municipal Corporation (...

High Court

High Court Issues Directions in Slum Rehabilitation Writ Petitions; Expresses Grave Concern Over Alleged Fraud. No Final Verdict; Ongoing Investigation into Trafficking of Tenements and Non-Fixation of Transit Rent Under SRA Circular.

20 Jun 2023

The Bombay High Court issued a detailed common order in a batch of writ petitions filed by slum dwellers of the Kolekalyan Slum Rehabilitation Authori...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

6 Jan 2017

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute, Holding Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Over Private Civil Rights Despite Bar Under SRA Act. The court clarified that private disputes regarding joint possession of transit premises are not barred by Section 42 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

26 Aug 2013

The appellant, Bansnarayan Sitaprasad Patel, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Greater Bombay, seeking a declaration of his entitlement to joint p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Scheme. Petitioners, Tenement Owners, Opposed Redevelopment by Developer Appointed by Majority of Society Members and Sought Quashing of Eviction Order and Declaration that Scheme Is Illegal.

24 Apr 2012

The petitioners, eight members and owners of tenements in Chitranjan Nagar Vidya Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Rajawadi, Ghatkopar (East), Mumb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Tenants Against MHADA in Slum Rehabilitation Disputes — Held That Tenants in Possession Before Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by tenants against the Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) concerning slum rehabilitat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

26 Apr 2006

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Slum Dwellers Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Project — Project Approved Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act for Rehabilitation of 132 Slum Dwellers.

2 Mar 2005

The petition was filed by Amba Chawl Wadi Rahiwasi Seva Sangh, a registered society representing residents on a plot owned by the Municipal Corporatio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Separate Slum Rehabilitation Tenements; Holds Independent Structure Essential for Eligibility Under Regulation 33(10). Court Rules That Electoral Rolls Showing Separate Rooms Not Sufficient When Survey and Identity Cards Indicate Single Structure, Requiring One Tenement per Structure.

3 Mar 2005

The High Court of Bombay dismissed two writ petitions filed by occupants of a chawl in Ghatkopar seeking separate permanent alternative accommodation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Resident Welfare Association Against Developer for Non-Payment of Adequate Compensation Under DCR 33(7). MHADA Directed to Determine and Enforce Compensation for Temporary Alternate Accommodation as Per Notarized Agreements.

26 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Kagalwala Building Resident Welfare Association, representing residents of a building being redeveloped by respondent No.4 (Aaraaish D...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)