Search Results for "trade mark assignment"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax on Hire Purchase Components Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Option Money, Insurance, and Hire Premium Included in Sale Price. Hire Purchase Transaction Constitutes a Sale and Resale Deduction Under Section 8 Not Available.

The case involves two sales tax references under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving 'TANGO PUNCH' and 'TANGO CHARLIE' for Country Liquor. Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles by Defendant Constitutes Infringement of Registered Composite Mark.

The Plaintiff, Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Pvt. Ltd., and the Defendant, Lokranjan Breweries Pvt. Ltd., both manufacture and sell country liquor. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Defendant in Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles for Country Liquor Constitutes Infringement of Registered Mark 'TANGO PUNCH' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited, and the defendant, South Konkan Distilleries, both manufacture and sell country liquor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in Beer Product Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAYWARDS 5000' held to be deceptively similar to Defendant's 'COX 5001', warranting protection pending trial.

The plaintiff, Sabmiller India Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant, Jagpin Breweries Ltd., for infringing its r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant for Trademark Infringement and Passing Off of Identical Mark SPASGAN in Pharmaceutical Preparations. Plaintiff's Registered Trademark SPASGAN Entitled to Protection Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Wockhardt Limited, filed a suit against Eden Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. seeking to prevent infringement and passing off of its trademark SPAS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Passing Off Action by Medley Laboratories. Marks 'HB TONE' and 'RB TONE' Held Deceptively Similar for Pharmaceutical Products, Injunction Confirmed.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (original defendant) for infringement and passing o...