Search Results for "town and country planning"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State's Refusal to Modify Development Plan Reservation. State's Discretion to Revert Land to Original Reservation Upheld Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Tukaram Mohite (since deceased through legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the suit property and approached the court after substantial delay.

The case involves a writ petition filed by legal heirs of the original petitioner, Mr. Limo Cortez, challenging the construction approval granted by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the property and approached the court after substantial delay.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original petitioner Limo Cortez, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...