Search Results for "thirty days"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "thirty days"

1308 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1308 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

3 Mar 2025

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Co-operative Society Recovery Case, Restoring Auction Sale. The High Court's order setting aside the auction sale was quashed due to borrower's failure to demonstrate substantial injury and non-compliance with procedural rules under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Rules, 1961.

16 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from recovery proceedings initiated by a co-operative bank against a borrower, Vaishnavi Hatcheries Company Limited, and its directo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Labour Cess Demand Under Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The Court held that the cess demand was invalid as the contract work did not constitute 'building or other construction work' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, and the levy under Sections 3(1) and (2) of the Cess Act was not applicable.

12 May 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Central Organisation for Railway Electrification Against Appointment of Independent Arbitrator in Contract Dispute. Statutory Ineligibility Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act Prevents Serving and Retired Railway Officers from Acting as Arbitrators Despite Contractual Clause.

17 Dec 2019

The appellant, Central Organisation for Railway Electrification, awarded a work contract to the respondent, a joint venture company, on 20.09.2010. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Corrigendum to Award Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Original Award

6 Feb 2017

The petitioners, Karuppiah Mahalingam and others, had availed a loan against mortgaged property from Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited. They defaulted on re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Workman in Labour Dispute, Holding Labour Court Became Functus Officio After 30 Days from Publication of Award. Application to Set Aside Exparte Award Filed Beyond 30 Days from Publication Under Section 17A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Rule 26 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 is Not Maintainable.

1 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Anantrao Kulkarni, was engaged as a skilled labourer from 01/04/1985 and was terminated orally on 20/09/1996. The Kalelkar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Respondent Failed to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days as Per Agreement. The court appointed a retired judge as sole arbitrator after the respondent's belated appointment did not cure the initial failure.

9 Apr 2013

The applicant, Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd., entered into an agreement with the respondent, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., on 14th N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Strict Compliance Required for Reduced Penalty Under Section 11AC. The benefit of 25% penalty is available only if duty, interest and reduced penalty are paid within 30 days of the original adjudication order, not the Tribunal's order.

25 Jun 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)