Search Results for "terrorizing"

35 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Detenu's Bail Status in Pending Criminal Cases.

The petitioner, Kiran Dhanraj Kharat, challenged a detention order dated 13 December 2017 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act, 1981. Detention Order Under Section 3(2) Challenged for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Credible Material.

The petitioner, Manoj @ Sonya S/o Ramdas Ghule, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 14, 19, 21, 22 and 226 of the Constitution of India and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Compliance with Section 59 of Bombay Police Act — Show Cause Notice Not Served in Manner Prescribed by Law. Failure to Serve Notice as Per Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 Renders Externment Order Under Section 56 Invalid.

The petitioner, Radhakisan Waman Patol, a resident of Wadgaon (Kolhati), Aurangabad, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Remission Order in TADA Case — State Government Directed to Reconsider Without Fixing 30-Year Cap. Remission under Section 432 CrPC cannot be conditioned on a fixed term of 30 years for life convicts under TADA.

The petitioner, Ravindra Shantaram Sawant, was convicted in TADA Special Case No.31/1994 by the Designated Court for offences under Sections 3(2)(ii),...