Search Results for "suo motu initiation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "suo motu initiation"

266 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines to Combat Child Marriage in India — Emphasizes Constitutional Rights and International Obligations. The Court held that child marriage violates fundamental rights and directed stronger enforcement of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, along with preventive and support measures.

18 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in a public interest litigation filed by the Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal on NGT's Suo Motu Jurisdiction. The Court held that the National Green Tribunal lacks suo motu powers under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, as it is a statutory tribunal without inherent jurisdiction, but can act on epistolary jurisdiction based on letters from interested parties.

7 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appeal led by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against Ankita Sinha and others, addressed the jurisd...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Personal Guarantor Against Initiation of Insolvency Resolution Process Under IBC. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority correctly admitted the application under Section 95 of the IBC as the debt was due and default occurred, and the personal guarantor's objections regarding limitation and pending proceedings were not sustainable.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by Mahdoom Bava Bahrudeen Noorul Ameen (Appellant) under Section 61(3) read with Section 61(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Tenancy Dispute Due to Delayed Suo-Motu Inquiry Under Section 84-C of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Three-Year Delay in Initiating Inquiry Held Unreasonable, Forfeiture Order Quashed.

13 Jan 2011

The petitioner, Appa Dadu Patil, through his power of attorney holder, challenged the orders passed by the Tenancy Avval Karkoon, the Sub-Divisional O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Limitation Period for Suo-Motu Revision Not Specified, But Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time. Revisional Authority Initiated Proceedings After 17 Years, Which Was Held Unreasonable and Unsustainable Under Section 7 of the Act.

5 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Bajirao Jivanrao Patil, was the purchaser of agricultural land from Rupchand Chindhu Patil, whose predecessor-in-title had purchased t...

High Court

High Court Quashes Suo Motu Reopening Notice Under Ceiling Act for Being Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 3 Years Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Strictly Adhered To.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sidram Ganpatrao Solunke, were original land holders in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Reopening Notices Under Ceiling Act Due to Limitation. Additional Commissioner's power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must be exercised within three years from the date of the original order; notices issued after 16 years are barred.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Balasaheb Bhaurao Muley, a resident of village Irlad, was the original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Inquiry Under MCS Act — Inquiry Valid Despite Non-Compliance with Section 83 Notice Requirements. Court holds that Section 84 inquiry can be initiated without prior notice under Section 83 when there is a prima facie case of mismanagement.

26 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Jayprakash Sahakari Griha Rachana Sanstha Mrt., a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act),...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)