Search Results for "sugarcane control order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "sugarcane control order"

121 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Cane Commissioner's Order Modifying Sugarcane Area Reservation Due to Chief Minister's Interference and Violation of Natural Justice. Order Under Clause 6 of Sugar Cane (Control) Order, 1955 Set Aside as Cane Commissioner Abdicated His Statutory Duty and Denied Hearing to Affected Party.

21 Nov 1968

The appellant, Purtabpore Co. Ltd., a sugar mill situated in Uttar Pradesh near the Bihar border, had for decades sourced its sugarcane from 208 villa...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Denial of NOC for Sugar Mill — No Legal Right to NOC Under Sugarcane Control Order. The court held that the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 does not confer a right to obtain a No Objection Certificate for setting up a sugar mill, and the Commissioner's refusal based on existing capacity was valid.

31 Mar 2023

The appellants, M/s Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s Shri Bharmanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ appeal against the order of a learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sugar Mills' Challenge to Cess Notification on Sugarcane. State Notification Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce (Development and Regulation) Act, 1965 Held Ultra Vires Due to Repugnancy with Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

30 Apr 2020

The petitioners, seven sugar mills in Maharashtra, challenged a Government notification dated 22.3.2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Agri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory — Notification Increasing Distance Not Retrospective. The court held that the Commissioner of Sugar was not required to consider factors beyond aerial distance under Clause 6-B of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

5 Dec 2014

The petitioner, a sugar factory registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated 2 July 2011 of the Commissioner of Sugar, Maharas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Sugar Mills' Appeals Against Sugarcane Price Fixation Order — State's Power to Fix Minimum Price Upheld. The Court held that the Sugarcane Control Board's order fixing the minimum price of sugarcane at Rs. 2,500 per tonne was valid and not arbitrary, as it was based on recommendations of the Cane Commissioner and aimed at protecting farmers' interests.

12 Feb 2015

The case involves appeals by four sugar mills against an order of the Sugarcane Control Board fixing the minimum price of sugarcane at Rs. 2,500 per t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to State Notification Fixing Sugarcane Price Despite Central FRP Under Essential Commodities Act. Section 6 of the EC Act Grants Overriding Effect to Central Orders Over Inconsistent State Enactments.

6 Nov 2014

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the state government's notification fixing sugarcane price and the c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Sugar Commissioner's Refusal of Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory. Court Upholds Commissioner's Decision Based on Non-Compliance with Minimum Distance Requirement Under Sugarcane Control Order, 1966.

14 Dec 2011

The petitioner, Sangmeshwar Sugar Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, sought to establish a new sugar factory at Sonegaon, Ya...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Previous Court Direction. Order passed without considering objections and contrary to earlier writ court direction to hear petitioners before granting licence to third party.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s. Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Investigation Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1955. Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Covers Sugarcane; Rule Requiring Payment within 14 Days Valid and Offence Cognizable.

25 Jul 1969

The case involved a criminal investigation initiated against the office bearers of a sugar concern under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, for alle...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Binding Precedent. Order of Commissioner for Cane Development set aside for being contrary to earlier court direction and lacking reasons.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioners, M/S. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S. Shri. Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)