Search Results for "stolen property"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "stolen property"

468 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Claim for Return of Stolen Property in Criminal Writ Petition — Property Directed to be Returned to First Informant Rather Than Goldsmiths from Whom It Was Recovered. The Court Held That the Victim of Theft Is Entitled to Return of Stolen Property Under Section 457 CrPC, Not the Persons from Whom It Was Recovered, Absent Any Claim of Ownership.

28 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Anandi Roy, lodged a report with Osmanpura Police Station, Aurangabad, alleging theft of gold ornaments and cash worth Rs. 89,300 from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Claim Over Seized Gold in Housebreaking Case — Directs Return of 80 Grams Gold to Petitioner on Supurdnama. Court Holds That a Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice Has a Superior Claim Over Stolen Property Compared to the Original Owner Who Failed to Exercise Due Diligence.

7 Jan 2010

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by Pandit Digamber Udawant (petitioner) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Stolen Property Case Due to Lack of Proof of Knowledge. Conviction under Sections 411 and 412 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that appellants knew or had reason to believe the recovered ornaments were proceeds of dacoity.

19 Jul 2012

The appellants, Ashok Suryabhan Kale and Bhausaheb Suryabhan Kale, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Gold Necklace — Custody of Article 30 Given to Appellant as Owner Based on Evidence of Theft. The court held that the trial court erred in granting custody to respondent no.2 based on prior custody during investigation, ignoring evidence that the article was stolen property.

27 Apr 2012

The appellant, Jitendra Shantilal Thalesar, was the original complainant in Sessions Case No.578 of 1991 arising from Crime No.428 of 1990 registered ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Orders Denying Return of Stolen Property under Section 451 Cr.P.C., Holds Ownership Survives Change in Physical Form. Complainant Entitled to Return of Ingots Made from Stolen Ornaments on Supurdnama When Prosecution Affirms Origin.

27 Apr 2012

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad considered a criminal writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by Bhagawan Shriram Ah...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 411 IPC Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge of Stolen Property. Conviction for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Mens Rea Under Section 411 IPC.

10 Aug 2012

The applicant, Rajesh Ganeshmal Oswal, was accused no.4 in Regular Criminal Case No.110 of 2008 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Railway C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Return of Seized Vehicle in Theft Case Under Section 457 CrPC — Vehicle Not Required for Investigation and No Other Claimant Appears. The court held that property seized under Section 102 CrPC can be returned under Section 457 CrPC, and the petitioner being the registered owner is entitled to interim custody.

21 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Amol Ramhari Waje, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) challenging the orders of the Magist...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Case for Theft of Vehicle Purchased at Auction — Insurer Cannot Repudiate Claim on Ground of Lack of Insurable Interest When Premium Was Accepted and Policy Issued Reflecting Transferee's Name.

31 Jul 2019

The appellant, M/s. Balwant Singh & Sons, purchased a vehicle at an auction conducted by ICICI Bank, the hypothecatee, after the original owner (third...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Section 411 IPC Case for Lack of Proof of Guilty Knowledge. Conviction for Dishonest Receiving of Stolen Property Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish That Appellant Knew Property Was Stolen.

7 Jul 2018

The appellant, Sharad Mahadev More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for an offence punishable under Section 411 of the...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)