Search Results for "special contract premium"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Driver Upheld, Multiplier Applied Correctly. The Court enhanced compensation from Rs.15,47,000 to Rs.18,47,000 by adding future prospects and applying multiplier 18 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of the deceased, Samilulla and Ashrafunisa, seeking compensation for the dea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Renewal Dispute — Insurer Must Disclose Material Changes in Coverage at Renewal. Renewal of Insurance Policy is Not a Fresh Contract; Insurer Owed Duty to Inform Insured of Restrictive Terms Under Principle of Utmost Good Faith.

The appellants, Jacob Punnen and his wife, held a Mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. since 1982, renewed annually. In March 2008, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Accident Victim and Fixes Liability on Insurance Company in Motor Vehicle Accident Case. Claimant sustained grievous injuries due to driver's negligence; Insurance Company held liable as no evidence of invalid license.

The case involves an appeal filed by the claimant under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 27.06...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MIDC for Unilateral Rescission of Land Allotment — MIDC's Action Held Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice. Concluded Contract Exists Upon Acceptance of Consideration, Entitling Petitioner to Specific Performance.

The petitioners, Kamlakar Bhimrao Patil and Terrafirm Softtech Private Limited (formerly Everest Realtors Pvt. Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Premium Claim Under REP Circulars — Policy Change Prospective, No Vested Right to Premium on Licenses Issued Prior to Amendment.

The petitioners, Kagaz Packaging (a partnership firm) and its partner Ms. Rajul Manoj Shah, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging...