Search Results for "sole ownership"

1143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Co-owner's Title in Ancestral Property Despite Consolidation Officer's Order Expunging Name. Section 49 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 Does Not Confer Power to Divest Pre-existing Tenure Holder's Ownership Rights.

The case concerns a dispute over ancestral land in village Mustafabad, Haridwar, originally owned by Angat, who had three sons: Ramji Lal, Khushi Ram,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Full Ownership for Widow under Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Widow's Pre-1956 Acquisition via Partition Award Confers Absolute Rights under Section 14(1), Not Restricted Estate under Section 14(2).

A Hindu male, who owned self-acquired properties, died in 1947 leaving behind five sons and a widow. In 1950, the heirs appointed an arbitrator to par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Share Ownership Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Transfer of Shares Held by Trust. Court holds that a trustee cannot seek declaration of exclusive ownership of trust property in personal capacity without joining all trustees and beneficiaries.

The case involves two appeals from an order of the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, dated 10 May 2019, which granted an interim injunction in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Fails to Prove Sole Ownership and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that appellant failed to establish exclusive title and that suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Namdeo Gangaram Mandalkar (since deceased, represented by his heirs), and the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title. Declaration of Ownership Denied as Plaintiff Could Not Establish Exclusive Title Over Suit Properties Claimed as Self-Acquired.

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by his heirs) against the judgment of the Bombay City Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Declaring Plaintiffs' Ownership of 3/4th Share in Suit Property. Agreements Executed by Co-Owners Held Not Binding on Plaintiffs' Undivided Share Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21 August 2003 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Special Civil Suit No.2107 ...