Search Results for "seized jewellery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "seized jewellery"

131 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals of Gold Smuggling Accused in Customs Act Case — Confirms Tribunal's Finding of Involvement in Smuggling Conspiracy Based on Documentary Evidence and Circumstantial Links. The court held that the presence of incriminating documents and the modus operandi of using eligible passengers to smuggle gold jewellery established the appellants' involvement in the smuggling network under the Customs Act, 1962.

10 Jan 2025

The case involves 16 Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging a common order dated 24.12.2009 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Murder of Four Family Members in Brutal Robbery-Murder Case. Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 449, 460, 201 IPC for Killing Two Adults and Two Children in Their Flat.

9 Dec 2024

The case arises from a brutal murder of four members of a family in their flat in Pune. The accused, Bhagwat Bajirao Kale, was a labourer working at a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Case — Redemption Fine and Penalty Reduced for Import of Used Personal Effects. Gold chain with diamond pendant held to be 'personal effects' under Baggage Rules, 1998, entitling duty-free import.

5 Jul 2024

The petitioner, a US citizen of Indian origin, arrived in Mumbai on 6th May 2007 from New York. He was wearing a gold chain with a pendant embedded wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Income Tax Search and Seizure Action Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Holds That Formation of Reason to Believe by the Authorizing Officer Is Based on Material on Record and Not Open to Challenge Unless Malafide or No Material Exists.

10 May 2024

The petitioners, a private limited company and its directors and their relatives, challenged the search and seizure action conducted on 9th and 10th J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Matrimonial Dispute Over Misappropriation of Stridhan. High Court's Reversal of Family Court's Findings on Custody and Misappropriation of Gold Jewellery Set Aside Due to Improper Reappreciation of Evidence.

24 Apr 2024

The appeal arises from a matrimonial dispute where the appellant-wife claimed that her gold jewellery (89 sovereigns) and Rs. 2,00,000 given by her fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Illegal Disposal of Seized Gold Jewellery Without Notice and Before Confiscation Order. Customs Authorities Directed to Pay Current Market Value for 1028 Grams of Gold Disposed in Violation of Section 111 of Customs Act, 1962 and Article 300A of Constitution.

21 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Leyla Mohmoodi and Mojtaba Ebrahim Gholami, through their constituted attorney, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and Sections 392/397 IPC for robbery, with life imprisonment and seven years rigorous imprisonment respectively.

25 Feb 2020

The appellant, Girvarsingh Bhagwatsingh Devda, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi, for the murder of Nirmala Premji Vora and for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

24 Jan 2014

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.

13 Oct 2010

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)