Search Results for "section 34"

603 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 603 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 -- MOU Found Not Amenable to Specific Performance Due to Third-Party Litigation

The High Court dismissed an Arbitration Petition challenging an Arbitral Award that rejected claims for specific performance of a Memorandum of Unders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute Between Parties Arbitration Petition Allowed Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Procedural Irregularities

The High Court allowed an arbitration petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute -- The Court found that the arbitral tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Reinstating District Judge's Decision Upholding Arbitral Award. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Re-evaluating Evidence and Decreeing Claim, Contrary to Limited Scope of Judicial Review.

The dispute originated from a contract dated 4 April 2002 between Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd and M/s Ramesh Kumar and Company for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over 'Change in Law' Clause — High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Interpretation of contractual clause by Arbitral Tribunal was plausible and not perverse, hence not liable to be set aside under Section 34.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by South East Asia Marine Engineering and Constructions Ltd. (SEAMEC Ltd.) against the judgment of the Gauh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Consignment Agent Dispute — MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. Scope of Interference with Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limited to Grounds of Public Policy and Patent Illegality.

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by MMTC Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had upheld the majority arbitral a...