Search Results for "seat and venue"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "seat and venue"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute, Reversing High Court's Return of Petition. Designated Seat of Arbitration at Srinagar Determines Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Jammu & Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997, Irrespective of Venue at New Delhi Where Proceedings Were Conducted and Award Rendered.

15 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a High Court order that returned a petition filed under Section 34 of the Jammu & Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Seat of Arbitration Determined as Hong Kong Based on Clause 17.2 of MoU.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Mankastu Impex Private Limited, an Indian company, and the respondent, Airvisual Limited, a Hong Kong company, entered into a Memorand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Appointment Application for Lack of Jurisdiction — Venue Designation in Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Seat of Arbitration. Court holds that mere mention of 'venue' in arbitration clause without specifying 'seat' does not vest jurisdiction in courts at the venue, especially when subject matter lies outside its territorial limits.

21 Mar 2023

The applicant, Honey Bee Multitrading Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in mustard oil manufacturing with its plant in Ganganagar, Rajasthan, entered into ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute — Venue Designation as Bhubaneswar Constitutes Exclusive Seat for Supervisory Court. Madras High Court Erred in Assuming Jurisdiction Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Parties' Agreement Fixing Bhubaneswar as Venue/Seat.

1 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Brahmani River Pellets Limited (appellant) and Kamachi Industries Limited (respondent) concerning a contract f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute, Holds Ahmedabad Courts Competent for Section 34 Petition. Mutual Consent to Shift Venue to Ahmedabad Established Seat There, Granting Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Overriding Original Clause Designating Rajasthan Courts.

13 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute over jurisdiction for a Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appellant, Inox Rene...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Venue Change in Arbitration Dispute — Clause 19.3(b) of Agreement Held to Specify Seat, Not Venue, Under Section 20 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Dhule Municipal Commissioner, challenged an interim order dated 16/06/2024 passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Proceeding No....

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Apr 2026

The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...

High Court

High Court Holds No Territorial Jurisdiction in Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Facilitation Council Award Due to Statutory Arbitration in Pune. Contractual Arbitration Clause for Mumbai Seat Did Not Apply as Proceedings Were Conducted Under Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.

10 Sep 2025

This matter involved a preliminary objection to territorial jurisdiction raised by SVS Aqua Technologies LLP in petitions filed by GEA Westfalia Separ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Held to be Dubai, UAE, Not India, Based on Express Terms of Distributorship Agreement.

15 Nov 2024

The present petition was filed under Section 11(6)(a) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Transfers Section 34 Petitions to Delhi High Court Following Designation of Seat of Arbitration as New Delhi. The Court held that once the seat of arbitration is designated, only courts where the seat is located have exclusive jurisdiction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court dealt with multiple transfer petitions and a civil appeal arising from orders passed by the Additional District Judge-cum-Presiding ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)