Search Results for "season ticket"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "season ticket"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Online Booking Convenience Fees. The Court considered whether service charges exceeding Rs.10 per ticket form part of 'payment for admission' under Section 2(b) of Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 1923.

6 Aug 2025

The writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an amendment to the Maharashtra ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Amusement Park Duty Dispute — Concessional Rate Under Section 3(5)(a) of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 Not Further Reducible by Section 3(2). The court held that a general admission ticket to an amusement park does not qualify as a lump sum payment for a series of entertainments under Section 3(2), so the duty for the fourth and fifth years is 7.5%.

18 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute concerned the rate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Validity of Government Orders Prohibiting Convenience Fees on Online Cinema Ticket Booking in Writ Petitions. Petitioners Challenged State's Prohibition of Additional Service Charges Under Article 19(1)(g) and Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act, 1923, Asserting No Statutory or Executive Power to Regulate Private Contract Consideration.

10 Jul 2025

These writ petitions arose from a challenge to two Government Orders issued by the Revenue and Forests Department, Government of Maharashtra, which pr...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Claims Case and Remands for Relationship Proof Determination. Identity card number matching between identity card and monthly season ticket establishes passenger identity despite name discrepancy under Railways Act, 1989, and Tribunal must properly consider all documentary evidence for relationship proof.

10 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from an order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai dated 5th September 2014, which rejected compensation claims filed by the origin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Environmental Clearances for Passenger Jetty Project at Gateway of India. Petitioners Claim Violation of Coastal Regulation Zone Norms and Failure to Consider Alternative Site, Seeking Quashing of MCZMA Clearance and NOCs.

15 Jul 2025

These three writ petitions, heard analogously by the Bombay High Court, arose from residents' associations and members in the Colaba area challenging ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship Limited; Revenue Accepts That No Royalty Was Payable Under Race Promotion Contract. High Court Had Reversed AAR and Held That FOWC Had a Permanent Establishment in India Under Article 5 of the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.

1 Aug 2026

The appeals arose from a tax dispute concerning the Formula One Grand Prix event in India. Formula One World Championship Limited (FOWC), a UK tax res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Parents of 18-year-old who fell from train entitled to compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 despite absence of ticket.

22 Feb 2005

The appellants, parents of deceased Prasad Narshima Purohit, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.4,00...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Fall from Train as Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Recovery of Valid Monthly Season Ticket from Deceased's Body Establishes Bona Fide Passenger Status, Reversing Tribunal's Finding of Trespass.

9 Mar 2021

The appellants, parents of the deceased Milind Balaram Sakpal, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, alleging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Appellant Held to be Bona Fide Passenger Entitled to Compensation for Injuries from Fall from Train Due to Rush. The Court set aside the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, finding that the appellant's fall from a crowded local train constituted an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and that the appellant was a bona fide passenger holding a valid ticket.

24 May 2022

The appellant, Harish Chandra Damodar Gaikwad, filed a claim under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 seeking compensation for injuri...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)