Search Results for "sealed structure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "sealed structure"

173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Lock and Seal Notice in Unauthorised Construction Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 56(2A) of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Notice Must Specify Time for Compliance Before Locking and Sealing; Failure to Do So Renders Notice Invalid.

20 Jan 2026

The petitioner, R. Ashokan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 24.10.2025 issued by the B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Investigation and Management of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri — Ratna Bhandar Keys Disappearance and Pilgrim Facilities Addressed. Court Orders Reports from District Judge, State, and Central Governments, and Appoints Amicus Curiae for Temple Preservation and Management Under Article 32 of the Constitution.

4 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India was approached by way of a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, Mrinalini Padhi, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Transferor and Transferee Companies Despite Intervenor Objection. Non-Disclosure of Pre and Post Capital Structure in Explanatory Statement Did Not Invalidate Scheme When Shareholders Had Sufficient Information Under Section 393 of Companies Act, 1956.

31 Jan 2006

The transferor company, Chemidye Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd., and the transferee company, Thirumalai Chemicals Ltd., both engaged in similar chemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Lease Deed Not a Conveyance Under Maharashtra Stamp Act. Agreement for lease with possession does not amount to conveyance under Article 25 of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and stamp duty is payable under Article 36.

18 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited, entered into a development agreement-cum-lease deed with respondent No. 3, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction in Chennai. Court Holds Regularization is Not an Absolute Right; Unauthorized Commercial Floors Constructed Beyond Approved Plan Must Be Demolished Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.

10 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a construction company, challenged a removal notice issued by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) dated 28.11.2023, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorised Construction — No Right to Regularise Illegal Construction by Payment of Fees. The Court held that payment of development charges does not condone unauthorised construction under Sections 44 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

29 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Savitribai Phule Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, challenged a notice dated 9th March 2018 issued by the Solapur Municipal Corporation demand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision That Glass Curtain Wall Contracts Are Not Building Construction Contracts for Tax Purposes. Contracts for construction of glass curtain walls are not incidental or ancillary to building construction and thus not eligible for concessional tax rate under Notification dated 8 March 2000 issued under Section 6A(1) of the Maharashtra Sales Tax on the Transfer of Property in Goods involved in the Execution of Works Contracts (Re-enacted) Act, 1989.

6 May 2016

The Applicant, M/s. Permasteelisa (India) Pvt. Ltd., a registered dealer under the Bombay Sales Tax Act and the Maharashtra Sales Tax on the Transfer ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)