Search Results for "road widening acquisition"

217 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 217 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Corrigendum for Non-Existent Road — Adding New Purpose Without Fresh Notification Invalid Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Officer's Report Under Section 5A Recommending Dropping Acquisition Binding on Government.

The petitioners, Silvestre D' Souza and his wife Apolita D' Souza, purchased parts of a property in Santa Cruz, Goa, including a dwelling house. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Land Acquisition for Road Widening; Upholds Validity Under Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 Without Separate Notification

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land and buildings belonging to the appellants by the Tamil Nadu Highways Department for a road expansion pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners Failed to Show Statutory Violation or Arbitrariness in Acquisition Process.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their land for widening of the Aurangabad-Jalna road und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Pune. Acquisition under Section 126 of MRTP Act for public purpose is valid and petitioner cannot claim title over land reserved for road.

The petitioner, Atur Park-4 Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of its land for road widening in P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Notification Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld as Valid and for Public Purpose.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by shop owners and residents of Byadagi town, Haveri district, challenging the land acquisition proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners' Challenge to Section 6(1) Notification Fails Due to Delay, Laches, and Existence of Alternative Remedy.

The petitioners, who are residents and agriculturists of Mahalunge, Taluka-Mulshi, District Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lapse of Proceedings Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration Results in Acquisition Lapsing and Entitlement to Restoration of Possession.

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Sakleshpur Town — Petitioners Failed to Show Any Infirmity in Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, owners of various properties on B.M. Road in Sakleshpur town, challenged the acquisition of their land for widening of the road. The ...