Search Results for "road user fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "road user fee"

184 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NHAI Appeal in Toll Collection Dispute — High Court Direction to Stop Toll Collection Set Aside. The Court held that toll collection on a completed section of a national highway is permissible under Rule 3(1) of the National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008, even if the entire project is not complete, and the deposited toll amount may be utilized by NHAI.

24 Jul 2024

The appeal was filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) against the judgment of the High Court dated 05.04.2016, which allowed the wri...

High Court

Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.

28 Jan 2026

The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Directing Shift of Toll Plaza for Violation of National Highways Fee Rules. Construction at 194 km of NH30 Found to Violate Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 Due to Lack of Written Reasons and Failure to Meet Conditions for Municipal Area Placement.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 17 (writ petitioners) seeking to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging PMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium for Change of User of Land. Held that once development permission is granted and construction completed, the authority cannot unilaterally demand additional premium without statutory basis.

10 Apr 2024

The petitioner, B-Right Real Estate Limited, a real estate company, owned land in Pune within the jurisdiction of the Pune Metropolitan Region Develop...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

23 Jan 2026

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

High Court

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2012

14 Oct 2014

The appeal before the High Court arose out of an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissing the assessee's appeal and upholdi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of TDS on roaming and interconnect charges, holding that such payments are not 'fees for technical services' and that the assessee had a bona fide belief that no TDS was deductible.

28 Jul 2016

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax) against the order of the Income Tax ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of TDS on roaming and interconnect charges, holding that such payments are not 'fees for technical services' and that the assessee had a bona fide belief that no TDS was deductible.

28 Jul 2016

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS) against the common order o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of TDS on roaming and interconnect charges, holding that such payments are not 'fees for technical services' and that the assessee had a bona fide belief that no TDS was deductible.

28 Jul 2016

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS) against the common order o...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)