Search Results for "retirement age reduction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "retirement age reduction"

135 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 135 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bank Employee Disciplinary Case, Upholding Post-Retirement Penalty Under Service Regulations. Reduction of Pay Penalty Valid as Service Regulations Permit Continuation of Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Before Superannuation Under Regulation 20(3)(iii) of Punjab and Sind Bank Officers' Service Regulations, 1982.

19 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from disciplinary proceedings against a bank officer who superannuated while facing charges of irregularities in loan disbursement. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Leading Firemen/Tandel Against Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years. Reclassification of Post from Class-IV to Class-III Does Not Automatically Change Retirement Age Fixed Under Municipal Service Regulations, 1954.

2 May 2023

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Leading Firemen/Tandel (also referred to as Tandel) employed with the Pune Municipal Corporation, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wakf Board Employees to Continue Until 60 Years, Quashes Retirement at 58. Employees appointed under Wakf Act, 1954 and Marathwada Wakf Board Regulations, 1964 are entitled to retirement age of 60 years as per Section 79 of Wakf Act, 1995, not 58 years under Maharashtra Civil Services Rules.

26 Sep 2022

The petitioners, employees of the Maharashtra State Board of Wakf, were appointed under the Wakf Act, 1954 and the Marathwada Wakf Board Regulations, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

16 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IFCI's Appeal Against Retirees' Claim for Enhanced Pension Under VRS-2008. Voluntary Retirement Scheme's Full and Final Settlement Clause Bars Subsequent Claims for Pay Revision Benefits.

17 Sep 2019

The dispute pertains to thirty-one employees of IFCI who voluntarily retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2008 (VRS-2008) on 1 February 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Interest Case — No Interest on Delayed DCRG and CVP When Judicial Proceedings Were Pending at Retirement. Rule 4 of Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981 disentitles commutation during pendency of judicial proceedings.

8 Mar 2019

The case pertains to an appeal by the Chief General Manager, Gujarat Telecom Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and others against the judgment of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired University Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Discipline Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Voluntary Retirement Cannot Be Sustained Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 Without Specific Provision.

3 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Manohar B. Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University. He applied for voluntary retirement and w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds 60 Years Retirement Age for Workmen Under Model Standing Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years Held Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

6 Jun 2011

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and Cross Objection against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction for Government Employees — Rule of Promulgation and Publication of Statutory Rules Upheld. Reduction of retirement age from 60 to 58 years invalid due to non-publication of amended rules under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.

6 May 2011

The petitioners, five retired government employees of the Public Works Department in Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction by National Textile Corporation. Division Bench precedent upholding rollback from 60 to 58 years held binding.

17 Aug 2006

The petitioners, three employees of India United Mills prior to its nationalization under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1974, c...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)