Search Results for "retirement age extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "retirement age extension"

191 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Municipal Employee Before Age 58 — Violation of Service Regulations. Compulsory retirement at age 55 without following Regulation 25(3) of BMC Service Regulations, 1989 set aside as arbitrary and illegal.

7 May 2026

The Petitioner, Smt. Yashoda Bapu Jadhav, was an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was compulsorily retired at the ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

13 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Leave Encashment Case for Re-employed Government Servant. Re-employed Employee Entitled to Second Leave Encashment Under Rule 36 of Sikkim Government Services (Leave) Rules, 1982, as Rule 32 Creates Legal Fiction Treating Re-employment as Fresh Service Entry.

23 Apr 2025

The dispute originated from the State of Sikkim's appeal against High Court orders that granted leave encashment benefits to a re-employed government ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Allowing Voluntary Retirement of Assistant. Rule 48-A of CCS Pension Rules Prevails Over Administrative Circulars and Fundamental Rule 56(k)(1) — Employer's Rejection on Grounds of Staff Shortage Held Arbitrary.

26 Jul 2024

The Union of India and others (petitioners) challenged the order dated 01.03.2024 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which allowed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.

19 Apr 2024

The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

15 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

28 May 2020

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Professor Seeking Enhanced Retirement Age Under UP Government Notification. Held that a medical teacher who was granted end-of-session extension of service is entitled to benefit of subsequent notification enhancing retirement age from 60 to 65 years, as the extension postpones superannuation.

21 Jan 2020

The appellant, Dr. Chandra Mohan Varma, was a Professor and Head of the Department of Cardiology at LPS Institute of Cardiology, GSVM Medical College,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction for Government Employees — Rule of Promulgation and Publication of Statutory Rules Upheld. Reduction of retirement age from 60 to 58 years invalid due to non-publication of amended rules under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.

6 May 2011

The petitioners, five retired government employees of the Public Works Department in Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)