Search Results for "retail dealership"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "retail dealership"

51 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds Termination of Dealership for Breach of No-Other-Employment Clause. Appellant's failure to disclose employment with a private company while holding a petroleum dealership constituted a material breach of the Dealership Agreement and Marketing Discipline Guidelines.

3 Jun 2026

The appellant, P. Kalyanasundaravalli, was the proprietrix of M/s K.T. Bakthavatchalam Naidu Agency, an Indian Oil Corporation dealer. She was selecte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ineligibility for IOCL Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Lack of Land Ownership. Petitioner placed in Group-3 as she failed to provide proof of ownership of land, and her claim of ownership based on unregistered agreement was not accepted.

21 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Smt. Sharda W/o Arun Morghare, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a communicati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Dealership Allotment on Grounds of Non-Disclosure of Land Ownership. Petitioner's selection for SC PH category retail outlet dealership set aside due to failure to disclose that offered land was owned by her husband, not herself, violating BPCL guidelines.

8 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Suvarna Shrikrishna Deore, a Scheduled Caste (SC) candidate with 40% visual impairment, applied for a retail outlet dealership (petrol...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Clause Validity Dispute Under Lease Agreement. The arbitration clause designating the lessee's Managing Director as sole arbitrator is upheld as valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, absent contravention of public policy.

1 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court heard appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose from a lease agreemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Candidature for Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Candidature Was Rejected on Grounds Not Mentioned in the Advertisement or Brochure, and Without Providing an Opportunity to Explain.

24 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Nikhil Dilipsing Rajput, applied for a retail outlet dealership pursuant to an advertisement dated 25.11.2018 issued by the Indian Oil...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Oil Corporation, Upholds Termination of Dealership for Violation of Marketing Discipline Guidelines. Stock Variation and Sample Failure Constitute Critical Irregularities Justifying Termination Under Clause 8.2 of MDG 2012.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and others against the judgment of the Gauhati High Court which had set asid...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition on Retail Dealership Selection. Dispute Over Guidelines Applicability and Evaluation of Marks.

23 Aug 2017

The petitioner, an applicant for a retail outlet (petrol pump) dealership advertised by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOC) on 14 September 2011, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute — Upholds Termination for Adulteration of Motor Spirit. Arbitrator's findings of fact regarding adulteration and breach of dealership agreement are not open to interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

25 Mar 2013

The petitioner, M/s Saibaba Automobiles, a partnership firm, was a dealer of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (respondent). In 1986, a dealership was commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retail Outlet Dealership Selection for Arbitrary Marking. Court directs reassessment of marks for 'Liquid cash' criterion and fresh selection process.

5 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Shri Pundalik Tukaram Chowgule, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the selection process for a Reta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Retail Outlet Dealership Selection by Indian Oil Corporation — No Arbitrariness Found in Selection Process. Petitioner Failed to Establish Violation of Selection Criteria Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

9 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Anita Sidram Koli, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 (Indian Oil Corpora...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)