High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent
8 Aug 2024The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...
Search Results for "reconstructed building"
130 result(s) found
Found 130 result(s)
High Court
Court Upholds PMC's Demolition Notices for Illegal Green Belt Constructions in Pune. Petitioners' Plea for Regularization Rejected; Costs Imposed for Violations of Environmental Regulations
26 Jun 2024The petitioners challenge the demolition notices issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) for illegal structures built in the green belt zone on...
- 281
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Demolition Case — High Court Cannot Direct Reconstruction of Demolished Structure. The court held that the power to demolish illegal structures is vested in the municipal corporation and courts cannot direct reconstruction even if procedure was violated.
24 Oct 2019The case involves appeals by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against a High Court order directing reconstruction of a demolished structure...
- 282
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Housing Society's Petition for Mandamus to Demolish Staircase for Fire Access. Court holds that the Society failed to establish any legal right or breach of statutory duty by MMRDA or other authorities regarding open space requirements under Development Control Regulations.
19 Jun 2019The Petitioner, Bhavya Height Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ o...
- 181
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Dilapidated Building, Directs LIC to Reconstruct with Tenant Accommodation. The court held that the building was unsafe and required demolition, but LIC must provide alternative accommodation to tenants during reconstruction.
24 Jul 2015The judgment concerns a writ petition filed by tenants of the General Assurance Building in Mumbai, challenging a notice issued under Section 354 of t...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Co-operative Housing Society in CRZ-II Area Without Prior CRZ Clearance Under 2011 Notification — Stop Work Notice Quashed. The court held that para 8(iii) of the CRZ Notification 2011 permits redevelopment of existing authorized buildings in CRZ-II areas without prior CRZ clearance, and the stop work notice issued by MCZMA was invalid.
3 Sep 2014The petitioner, Sea Green Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is the lessee of land admeasuring approximately 1,672 sq. mtrs. in Worli, Mumbai, which f...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Reconstruction of Servant Quarters in Cantonment Area. Reconstruction Without Prior Sanction Under Section 238 of Cantonments Act, 2006 Constitutes Unauthorized Construction Justifying Demolition Under Section 248(1).
17 Jul 2014The petitioner, an occupant of residential premises within the Pune Cantonment Board limits, obtained sanction for building plans on 6 May 2008 under ...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.
14 Mar 2014The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.
20 Mar 2013The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Dispute — Landlord Estopped from Denying Tenancy After Accepting Status and Giving Undertaking for Alternate Accommodation. Principle of Estoppel Under Section 116 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Applied to Prevent Landlord from Resiling from Earlier Admissions.
10 Jan 2012The petitioner, Pius Bonaventure Fernandes, was a tenant of residential premises in 'Gorden House', Mumbai, owned by Manu Narang (predecessor of respo...
- 162
