Search Results for "rashness and negligence"

302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Medical Student in Rash Driving Case — Lack of Evidence of Negligence. FIR and Chargesheet under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 quashed as no prima facie case of rash or negligent driving established.

The applicant, Dr. Nidhi Suresh Kharabe, a 26-year-old medical student, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accident was caused by the accused's rash or negligent driving.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Gajanan Majik, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 (rash driving) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 304(A) and 279 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Rash or Negligent Driving Causing Death.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Bashir Janubhai Pathan, who was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Pathardi, for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 337 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Tatyarao s/o Ganpatrao Tambe, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (Court No.8), Aurangabad in S.C.C. No.3625 of 2001 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Grievous Hurt in Road Accident — Evidence of Eye Witnesses and Spot Panchanama Sufficient to Prove Negligence.

The applicant, Sumedh Shetye, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Valpoi for offences under Sections 279 and 338 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the bus driver was driving rashly or negligently at the time of accident.

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Deepak s/o Motiramji Bhoge, a driver employed with M.S.R.T.C., challenging his convictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove High Speed or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Madhukar Gaurishankar Swami, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khed, in Criminal Case No.482/1987 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries in Hit-and-Run Case. Revision Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC and Section 134(a)(b) r/w 187 MV Act Confirmed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Was Clear.

The revision petitioner, Mr. Vimanjan Hanumanta Devarkonda, was the original accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident that occurred on ...