KAHC020042082025_1
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "promotional examination"
259 result(s) found
Found 259 result(s)
High Court
High Court Dismisses CAG's Petition Challenging CAT Order Granting Retrospective Seniority to Employee in Seniority Dispute. Seniority must be assigned from date of eligibility, not from date of actual promotion, where delay is not attributable to employee.
10 Mar 2026The case involves a dispute over seniority in the cadre of Assistant Audit Officer (AAO) between the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) an...
- 350
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Addresses Reference on Withdrawal of ACPS Benefits for Non-Qualification in Departmental Test. Court Examines Whether Failing to Achieve Benchmark Marks in Promotion Examination Constitutes Ineligibility or Disqualification Justifying Withdrawal under 2001 and 2010 Government Resolutions.
12 Apr 2024The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was tasked with answering a reference framed by a Division Bench regarding the circumstances under which benef...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Policy Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority in High Court Administration. Court upholds that marks in departmental examination are not the sole criterion for promotion and that seniority can be given weightage under the applicable rules.
15 Jun 2022The petitioner, Kishore D. Raorane, joined the High Court administration on the Original Side as a Clerk in 1985 and retired as Master (Adm) in 2021. ...
- 52
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Promotees Seeking Time Bound Promotional Scale Parity with Direct Recruits in Punjab State Electricity Board. Promotee Assistant Engineers Not Entitled to 9/16 Years' Time Bound Promotional Scale from Date of Initial Appointment as Junior Engineer; Counting of Service for Such Scale Commences from Date of Direct Recruitment to Higher Post.
9 Oct 2020The appeals arose from a common order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 09.04.2014, which allowed intra-court appeals by the Punjab State Ele...
- 371
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.
5 Mar 2020The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...
- 744
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Power Corporation in Pay Parity Dispute Between Head Clerks and Internal Auditors. Internal Auditors Not Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Head Clerks Due to Different Recruitment, Duties, and Promotional Avenues.
8 Jan 2019The case involves a dispute between the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (appellant) and Rajesh Kumar Jindal and others (respondents), who are I...
- 159
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion of Colleagues in Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat. Petitioner's BGL Degree from Annamalai University Not Recognized as Equivalent to LL.B. for Promotion to Under Secretary Post Under Rule 6 of Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1973.
19 Jul 2016The petitioner, Pradeep Sakharam Mayekar, was employed as a Section Officer in the Maharashtra Legislative Council Secretariat. He sought promotion to...
- 73
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.
1 Jan 1970The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...
- 38
