Search Results for "promotion test"

898 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 898 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute Under Uttar Pradesh Transport Rules. Promotion Claim Rejected as Rules Mandate Competitive Examination for Assistant Public Prosecutor Appointment Under Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Transport (Subordinate) Prosecution Service Rules, 1979.

The dispute originated from the respondent's service as a Cashier in the Transport Department since June 1967. Following alleged misconduct, a departm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Internal Promotion Selection Criteria in MSETCL. Advertisement Specifying Written Test and Interview as Selection Basis Upheld; Performance Appraisal Not Required for Shortlisting.

The petitioners, employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. (MSETCL), challenged an internal advertisement dated 27-2-20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Seniority Order in Railway Promotion Dispute. Seniority for Promotion to Non-Selection Post Determined by Date of Passing Trade Test Under Paragraph 315 of Indian Railway Establishment Manual.

The petitioner, Shri Prakash Narayanrao Kolhe, challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 07.06.2000 which held that respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in ACP Scheme Dispute — Deployment as Radio Telephone Operators Held Not a Promotion. Reorganisation of Posts Without Selection Process Does Not Disentitle Employees to Assured Career Progression Benefits Under Office Memorandum Dated 9.8.1999.

The appellants, Telephone Operators with the Delhi Fire Service (DFS), were deployed as Radio Telephone Operators (RTOs) in a higher pay scale followi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Appeal in HR & CE Promotion Case — Considers Governing Principles on Promotion. Promotion Is Not a Right but Consideration Is Fundamental, and Filling Up Posts Is Administrative Prerogative; Panel Inclusion Gives No Right.

Background: The writ appeal arose from an order dated 24.01.2025 passed by a single judge in W.P.No.14422 of 2016, which was filed by the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions of JTOs Challenging Promotion Policy for Training Officers. The court upheld the validity of the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 and the promotion policy based on seniority-cum-merit.

The petitioners, who are Junior Training Officers (JTOs) in various Government Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) in Karnataka, challenged the prom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Policy for Air Vice Marshal Based on Seniority-cum-Merit. Air Commodore's Challenge Dismissed as Policy Valid and No Right to Promotion.

The appellant, Air Commodore Naveen Jain, was commissioned in the Indian Air Force in 1981 and promoted to Air Commodore in 2011. He was considered fo...