Search Results for "produced"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "produced"

16738 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16738 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Application to Produce Additional Documents in Suit by NTPC — Belated Filing After Cross-Examination Concluded and Multiple Prior Opportunities Not Availed. The court held that the defendant's conduct indicated a desire to delay the trial and that permitting the documents would cause prejudice to the plaintiff under Order 11 Rule 1 and Order 13 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

29 Jan 2016

The judgment concerns a Chamber Summons filed by the defendant, Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL), in a suit pending since 2006 filed by the plaintiff, N...

High Court

High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Cross-Examination Despite Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A(1) of CPC. Procedural Rules as Handmaid of Justice Permit Production for Limited Purpose of Confrontation When Documents Relate to Pleaded Facts and Are Not Foreign to Case.

4 Mar 2026

The petition was filed by defendant no. 1 challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to produce documents to confront plaintiff no....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Production of Documents in Commercial Suit — Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC Does Not Mandate Filing of Documents Only at First Hearing. The court held that the trial court's discretion to allow late production of documents under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC was valid and did not cause prejudice to the defendant.

10 Jun 2025

The petitioner, M/S. JSM Corporation Private Limited, was the defendant in Commercial Original Suit No.835 of 2023 filed by the respondents, M/S. Brun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Belated Production of Power of Attorney in Civil Suit. Foundational Pleadings Not Required at Production Stage; Trial Court's Discretion Upheld with Costs.

7 Nov 2019

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original deceased defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.222/2009, challenged the trial court's order dated 29.07...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Subsistence Allowance Dispute — Model Standing Orders Applicable to APMC. The court held that the definition of 'industrial or other establishments' under Section 2(ii) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, includes the act of presenting agricultural produce, making the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 applicable to the APMC.

30 Jan 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Nagpur, against the judgment of a Single Judge of...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Prosecution to Produce Additional Documents Under Section 242(2) Cr.P.C. — Documents Not Part of Charge-Sheet Can Be Received in Evidence if Filed Before Framing of Charges. The court upheld the trial court's order permitting production of 17 documents by prosecution in a case under Sections 408 and 201 IPC.

23 Jul 2018

The petitioners, accused in C.C. No. 1157/2010 for offences under Sections 408 and 201 IPC, challenged an order dated 11.04.2017 passed by the Civil J...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Prosecution to Produce Additional Documents Under Section 242(2) Cr.P.C. — Documents Not Part of Charge-Sheet Can Be Received in Evidence if Filed Before Framing of Charges. The court held that Section 242(2) Cr.P.C. applies before framing of charges and the prosecution's application was maintainable as charges were not yet framed.

23 Jul 2018

The petitioners, accused in C.C.No.1157/2010 for offences under Sections 408 and 201 IPC, challenged an order dated 11.04.2017 passed by the Civil Jud...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Film Production Dispute; Rejection of Producer's Damages Claim and Award of Costs Against Actor Stand. Court Finds No Perversity in Arbitrator's Finding That Claimant Failed to Prove Agreement with Gemini Industries, While Breach of Consent Terms Justified Costs of Rs.12 Lakhs.

16 Apr 2015

The dispute arose between Ajay Singh, an actor, and Suneel Darshan, a film producer, regarding the production of a film. In 2007, the parties entered ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)