Search Results for "pre-cognizance order"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Intervention Order in Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Proceedings. Proposed Accused Have No Right of Hearing at Pre-Cognizance Stage Under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, Mrs. Laxmi Mukul Gupta, filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Metropolitan Magi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Revision Against Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Court examines whether an order directing police investigation under Section 156(3) is interlocutory and whether a revision petition under Section 397 or 401 CrPC lies against such order.

A batch of criminal writ petitions and applications came before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, raising a common question o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Maintainability of Revision Against Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Division Bench Examines if Order Directing Police Investigation is Interlocutory and if Revision Lies Under Section 397 or 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, was seized of several criminal writ petitions and applications challenging orders passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings in Complaint Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Magistrate's Order Without Application of Mind and 14-Year Delay in Investigation Constitute Abuse of Process, Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The petitioners, Sayed Anwar Ahmed and Sayed Ghulam Raza Naqvi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Order for Further Investigation After Discharge of Accused. Magistrate Becomes Functus Officio After Discharge and Cannot Order Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC.

The appellant, Bikash Ranjan Rout, was the original accused in FIR No. 426/2007 registered at Police Station Janakpuri, Delhi for offences under Secti...