Search Results for "postal record destroyed"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Post Office in Indira Vikas Patra Loss Case — Rules No Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Lost Bearer Instrument Cannot Be Replaced Under Rule 7(2) of Indira Vikas Patra Rules, 1986.

The case involves appeals by the Superintendent of Post Office, Bolangir Division, Odisha, against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court Order Allowing Secondary Evidence in Cheque Dishonour Case. Lost Envelope with Refusal Endorsement Could Be Proved by Secondary Evidence Under Section 65(c) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The dispute arose from a summary criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Parbhani under Section 138 of the Negotiable Inst...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Postal Authorities in Kisan Vikas Patra Fraud Case. Postal authorities not vicariously liable for agent's fraud as payment was made to holder under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and appellants' negligence in signing instruments contributed to loss.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Pradeep Kumar and Raj Rani against postal authorities, including the Post Master General and othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Discrepancy in Date of Knowledge of Dishonour — Notice Held to be Within Time as Complainant Received Information on 23rd May, 1997.

The appellant, Tarachand Paliwal (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Rupesh Paliwal), filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Testamentary Suit, Dismissing Challenge by Widow of Predeceased Son. Court Finds No Suspicious Circumstances or Undue Influence Proven, Holds Will Valid Under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The dispute arose from the testamentary proceedings concerning the estate of Lady Jena Jamshedji Duggan, a social worker and dowager who died on 2nd S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...