Search Results for "port congestion"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Company Seeking Mandamus to Permit Construction of Captive Jetty and Cement Plant in Mangrove Area. Court holds that prior environmental clearances are mandatory and the petitioner cannot circumvent the directions in PIL No.87/2006.

The petitioner, Adani Cementation Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and part of the Adani Group, filed a writ petition see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Port Trust Demurrage Circular for Lack of Authority. Traffic Manager Cannot Levy Demurrage Without TAMP Approval Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The petitioners, M/s Kundil Sponge Iron Limited and its director Vijay Kashyap, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Steamer Agent Challenging Port Trust Circular Limiting Storage Duration. Circular Held Valid as Administrative Measure to Decongest Port, Not a Tariff Fixation.

The appellant, Maheshwary Handling Agency Private Limited, a steamer agent, challenged a circular dated 31st August 1998 issued by the Traffic Manager...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Stay of Cancellation of Letter of Award in Tender Dispute. Court holds that disputes arising from pre-contractual stage are not arbitrable and interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when no arbitration agreement exists.

The Petitioner, Provident Multi-Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Stays Tender Process for DPD Transport Solution — Transporters' Association and Importer Challenge Monopolistic Selection. Interim Order Prevents JNPT from Proceeding with Tender for Selection of Five Transporters, Protecting Existing Rights Pending Final Hearing.

The dispute arose from a tender notice dated 23 March 2017 issued by the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (Respondent No. 2) for selection of transporters ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.

The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute. Charter Party Agreement's Demurrage Clause Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Excepted Perils.

The petitioner, Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Suit Against Bank for Demurrage Charges — Bank Not Owner Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Suit Against Bank Barred by Limitation as Goods Sold in 1979 and Suit Filed in 1982.

The plaintiff, Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay (BPT), filed a suit against defendant No.1 (M/s. South Iron & Steel Co.) and defendant No.2 (Un...