Search Results for "policy exclusion"

1071 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1071 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute Due to Non-Communication of Exclusionary Clauses. The court restored the District Forum's order awarding compensation for theft loss, as the insurer failed to communicate exclusionary terms.

The appellant, Bharat Watch Company, a partnership firm, had insured its stock of watches with the National Insurance Co. Ltd. On the night of 3 Augus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging National Commission Order in Medical Insurance Claim Dispute. Policy Exclusion Clause for Pre-Existing Disease Upheld as Complainant Failed to Disclose Medical History.

The petitioner, Gunvantbhai Bhogilal Shah, along with his wife, availed a Group Medical Insurance Scheme from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exclusion of Unaided Private School Students from National Means cum Merit Scholarship Scheme. Classification Between Government/Aided/Local Body Schools and Unaided Private Schools Held Reasonable and Not Violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Sri Sri Ravishankar Vidya Mandir, a recognized unaided private school in Osmanabad, challenged the validity of Note I of clause 3(d) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Repudiation of Overseas Mediclaim Policy for Non-Disclosure of Pre-existing Condition Set Aside. Insurer Failed to Prove That Insured Had Knowledge of Hyperlipidaemia at Time of Proposal.

The appellant, Manmohan Nanda, sought an overseas mediclaim policy from United India Assurance Co. Ltd. to travel to the USA for a family wedding. He ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Consumer Case Over Exim Policy Incentives. Exporter Not a Consumer as Government Does Not Render Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Ministry of Commerce against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC...