Search Results for "pension enhancement"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Validity of HPCL Notifications Discontinuing and Revising Pension Benefits. The Court Examines Whether Employees Recruited Post-Acquisition and Retired Under ESSO/LIL Plans Are Entitled to Pension Protections Under ESSO Act, 1974 and Amalgamation Order.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Pensioners Social & Welfare Association, a registered so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Setting Aside Enhanced Penalty in Railway Disciplinary Case. Disproportionate Enhancement of Pension Cut from Three to Five Years Quashed Due to Non-Consideration of Evidence and Violation of Article 14.

The Union of India and other railway authorities filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 16th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Pension Grant to Scheme Employees Under Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules. Employees of Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana Held Entitled to Pension and Retiral Benefits as Per Government Decisions and Precedent in Vinod Kumar Goel.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 18.05.2016, which held that employees appointed under the Antar Gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension by Syndicate Bank — Violation of Natural Justice and Pension Regulations. Reduction of two-third pension without show cause notice set aside; bank directed to restore full pension and pay arrears.

The petitioner, B. Narayana Rao, was appointed as a Clerk in Syndicate Bank on 22.5.1972 and rose to the position of Senior Manager in Grade Scale-V b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Assistant Teacher Seeking Extension of Service Beyond 58 Years and 7th Pay Commission Benefits. Employee Born on 1st of Month Retires on Last Day of Preceding Month Under Rule 17 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher born on 01.01.1958, was superannuated on 31.12.2015 upon completing 58 years of age. He contended that he should ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Employees' Claim for 5th Pay Commission Benefits Under Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Court Holds Scheme Was Incentive for Voluntary Retirement, Not a General Pay Revision, Hence Not Applicable to Those Already Retired.

The petitioners, two former employees of Maharashtra State Oil Seeds Commercial & Industrial Corporation Ltd. (MOSICOL), retired on attaining the age ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.15 Lakhs Enhanced to Rs.27 Lakhs for 70% Disabled Mechanical Engineer. Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 14 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Pratap Dandapani Padhi, a 43-year-old Mechanical Engineer working as a Foreman at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited with a monthly s...