Search Results for "pendente lite transfer"

175 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Plaint to Include Relief Against Transferee Pendente Lite in Property Dispute. Transfer of Property Act Section 52 Applies to Bind Transferee Pendente Lite by Decree.

The petitioners filed Regular Civil Suit No.742 of 1996 seeking declaration and permanent mandatory injunction against the respondents regarding suit ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchaser Pendente Lite. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment Proper as Purchaser is Necessary Party to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioner, Fabrica Da Igreja De Vasco, purchased the suit property from the original defendant No.1 during the pendency of a suit filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit Involving Lis Pendens Transfer. Transfer of Suit Property During Pendency of Appeal Attracts Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The respondent filed a suit for injunction against Mohd.Osman, which was decreed on 1.4.2006. Mohd.Osman appealed on 15.4.2006. During the pendency of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree-Holder's Execution Against Pendente Lite Purchaser in Possession Suit. Held that a purchaser pendente lite is bound by the decree and can be dispossessed in execution under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC without a separate suit.

The petitioner, Kashinath Ramji Shinde (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a suit in 1987 seeking possession, declaration, and mesne p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Pendente Lite Purchasers in Partition Suit Execution — Objections Under Order XXI Rule 97 Barred Due to Lis Pendens. Consent Decree in Appellate Court Not Proved Collusive; Rigors of Section 52 Transfer of Property Act Apply.

The present second appeal arose from execution proceedings in a partition suit that commenced in 1974. The original plaintiff Shankarrao Kanakdande ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Temporary Injunction to Restrain Alienation Pending Suit is Necessary Despite Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Court Revisits Its Earlier Decision in Sharad Mor's Case in the Context of Multiple Appeals from Orders Refusing Injunctions.

These appeals raised a common question about the necessity of granting a temporary injunction to restrain a defendant from creating third party intere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Impleadment of Subsequent Purchasers in Partition Appeal. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC allows joinder of parties whose presence is necessary for effective adjudication, even if purchase is during pendency of litigation under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a partition suit, filed Regular Civil Suit No.268/2008 seeking half share in suit lands bearing Gat No.151 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Subsequent Purchaser to Join as Plaintiff Despite Lis Pendens — Order I Rule 10(2) CPC Not Barred by Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act. Transfer pendente lite does not preclude joinder of subsequent purchaser for effective adjudication of suit.

The petitioner, Yogesh s/o Balaji Misar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20-11-2012 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Bramhapuri, ...