Search Results for "pay re-fixation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "pay re-fixation"

73 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Allows State's Writ Appeal in Pay Re-fixation Matter and Sets Aside Single Judge Order. Division Bench Holds That G.O.Ms.No.340 Finance (Pay Cell) Department Dated 26.08.2010 Does Not Extend to Employees Appointed After 02.06.2009 and That Prior Orders Not Considering Its Scope Cannot Be Precedents.

4 Aug 2026

By way of background, the dispute arose from a writ petition filed by an employee seeking re-fixation of pay and allowances by extending the benefit o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner entitled to pay re-fixation from promotion date and junior's promotion dates with 6% interest on delayed arrears.

30 Jun 2006

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, entitled to re-fixation of basic pay from promotion date and interest on delayed payment under Article 226.

20 Jun 2006

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Personal Secretaries for Pay Refixation by Merging Special Pay into Basic Pay. The court held that special pay granted for higher responsibilities must be merged upon promotion to a higher post, quashing the state's order denying the benefit.

31 Jan 2018

The petitioners, an association of Personal Assistants, Private Secretaries, and Senior Private Secretaries of the Bombay High Court, along with an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Rs.1,40,030 from Retired Teacher in Pay Fixation Error Case. Recovery from Pensionary Benefits Without Prior Notice Held Unjust and Contrary to Supreme Court Precedent.

20 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Grace George Pampoorickal, was appointed as an Assistant Trained Teacher in 1970 and retired on 28 February 2010. Her last drawn pay w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Pension Refixation by Pune Municipal Corporation. Court holds that pension cannot be reduced without affording opportunity of hearing and that fixation of pay at time of promotion cannot be reopened after retirement.

5 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Shri Shrikant Chintaman Joshi, was a retired employee of the Pune Municipal Corporation. He was appointed as an Overseer on 8th July 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Barring Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Error. Employer Cannot Recover Excess Payment When Employee Did Not Misrepresent and Recovery Would Cause Hardship.

13 Jun 2006

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India and others against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which directed the petiti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Petition Challenging CAT Order on Pay Refixation. Repatriated Employee Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Enjoyed in Ex-Cadre Post, Refixation Set Aside.

19 Nov 2019

The Union of India and railway authorities (petitioners) challenged an order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Refund Order in Service Matter Concerning Pay Refixation. The Division Bench Upholds Single Judge's Direction to Refund Excess Salary Recovered from Employee, Applying Principles from State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih (2015) 4 SCC 334, Despite Confirmed Refixation of Pay.

15 Jul 2026

The dispute arose from an order of refixation of pay and consequential recovery issued by the Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine and ot...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Subordinate Judge’s Return of Refund Application in Pay Refixation and Recovery Matter. Holds that Once Recovery Order is Quashed, the Natural Consequence is Refund of Amounts Already Recovered, Independent of Confirmed Pay Refixation.

13 Jul 2026

The dispute arose from pay refixation and subsequent recovery of alleged excess payments from a court employee. The petitioner’s pay was refixed und...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)