Search Results for "outdoor advertisement"

19 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Interim Relief to Advertisement Agency in Arbitration Dispute Over Hoarding Construction Agreement. The court found a prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Adtrack Media LLP, an advertisement agency, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Selection Process in Public Employment Case Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. Recruitment for Junior Officer Posts Set Aside as Weightage Application After Tests Violated Advertisement Terms and Candidates' Rights Under Article 14.

The dispute arose from a recruitment process conducted by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd. for Junior Officer (Security) positions thro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Examines Challenge to Denial of Outdoor Advertisement License. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Order Dated 06.06.2024 and Direction to Grant License under Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023.

The litigation arose from the rejection of a license application for an outdoor advertisement hoarding by the Greater Chennai Corporation. The petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Hoarding Site. The Court upheld the Collector's allotment of a hoarding site to Respondent No. 5 and the Minister's rejection of the Petitioner's review application, finding no illegality or violation of policy.

The Petitioner, Sanjiv Manmohan Gupta, carrying on business as M/s. Global Advertisers, challenged the order dated 20th August 2021 allotting a hoardi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...