Search Results for "order passed before reply deadline"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Order in Favour of Assessee for Violation of Natural Justice. Reassessment Order Passed Before Expiry of Reply Deadline and Without Considering Timely Response Violates Fair Hearing Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an income tax reassessment proceeding initiated against the petitioner, Sai Kiran Clearing Co. Pvt. Ltd., by the Income Tax Dep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains MMRDA from Taking Coercive Actions in Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Demand for Construction Delay; Lease Deed Clauses on Time Limit and Additional Built-Up Area Interpreted

The petitioners, Raghuleela Builders Private Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act, Condoning 258-Day Delay. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Partnership Disputes Arising from Deed of Alteration of Partnership Dated 10 April 2013.

The applicant, Infra Poonam Developers LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal under Section 91 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 against Registrar's order permitting delayed evidence affidavit

The Bombay High Court heard an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 against an order of the Registrar of Trade Marks allowing a delaye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award — Time Limit in Consent Order Held Directory, Not Mandatory. Arbitrator's Mandate Did Not Terminate Automatically Upon Expiry of Four-Month Period Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition challenging an arbitral award dated 31.3.2004. The dispute originated from Suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order for Disclosure and Restraint Pending Suit on Foreign Judgments. The Order Directs Disclosure of Assets and Restraint on Alienation, Drawing Challenge Under Section 13 CPC and Execution Principles.

The appeal arises from an order dated 5 May 2026 passed by the Single Judge in an interim application in a suit filed by the respondents on 24 April 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Post-Foreign Award Relief in Commercial Arbitration Dispute - Vessel Sale Prior to Petition Filing Renders Relief Infructuous

The High Court dismissed a commercial arbitration petition seeking interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2019

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.

The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...