Search Results for "online gaming"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Gambling Offences Due to Lack of Public Order Threat. Detention Based Solely on Gambling Crimes Under Maharashtra Gambling Act Fails as Isolated Incidents Do Not Disturb Community Tempo Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The dispute involved a challenge to a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The petitioner, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes GST Attachment Order for Lack of Prior Notice Under Section 83 of CGST Act. Attachment of Bank Account Without Show Cause Notice Under Section 73/74 Held Illegal and Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Buckbox Infotech Private Ltd., a technology services provider registered under GST in Gujarat, challenged two attachment orders dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Enforcing Negative Covenants in E-Sports Collaboration Agreement. Court restrains Defendants from associating with competing platforms and disclosing confidential information pending trial.

The Plaintiff, Stoughton Street Tech Labs Pvt. Ltd., operates LOCO, an online live streaming and e-sports gaming platform. It entered into a Collabora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Under Karnataka Police Act for Lack of Mandatory Sanction. Petitioners Allegedly Involved in Gambling at Public Place, But Proceedings Initiated Without Sanction Under Section 78(3) of Karnataka Police Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Rakeshkumar S/o Satpal Girdhar, Santosh S/o Maruti Hulkund, and Gulab alias Gulabhusen S/o Nabisaab Naragund, were arraigned as accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Dream 11 for Alleged Gambling and GST Evasion. Fantasy Sports Held to be Game of Skill, Not Gambling Under Public Gambling Act, 1867.

The petitioner, a public-spirited advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to initiate criminal prosecution against Dream 11 Fa...