Search Results for "mine code"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "mine code"

314 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 314 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Earth from Metro Project. Excavated earth from underground metro construction not 'minor mineral' under Notification dated 3 February 2000; no royalty payable.

8 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Tata Projects Limited, a member of a consortium executing the Mumbai Metro Underground Project, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Corrigendum to SDO Order Under Section 133 CrPC — Substitution of 'or' by 'and' Held Illegal as It Removes Conditional Nature of Order. The Corrigendum effectively made the conditional order absolute without giving the transporters an opportunity of hearing, violating the scheme of Section 133 CrPC.

10 Feb 2010

The petitioners, mine transporters, challenged a Corrigendum issued by the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) of Bicholim on 03.02.2010, which substituted t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Royalty and Penalty Imposed on IKEA for Earth Excavated During Store Development. Earth Excavated and Utilised for Backfilling, Levelling, and Internal Roads on the Same Plot Is Exempt from Royalty Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Read with Rule 46 of the Extraction Rules, 2013.

10 Apr 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by IKEA India Private Limited and its authorised officer, challenging the demand for royalty and p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty and Seizure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Non-Covering of Sand During Transport. Failure to cover mineral with tarpaulin does not attract Sections 48(7) and 48(8) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 as those provisions apply only to illegal extraction or removal of minerals.

8 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Abdul Wasif Abdul Latif, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 2.9.2016 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Akot, imposin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.

8 Oct 2010

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Notice for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Permit — Holds That Prior Approval Under Section 21(6) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Is Not Required for Government Companies Executing Railway Projects. The court found that the notice proposing penalty for excavation of minor mineral without permission was invalid as the petitioners were a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways and the excavation was for a public purpose.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Ircon International Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways) and others, challenged a notice dated 4th Decem...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act and Rule 8(4) of MCR Rules, 2016. Petition Seeks Execution of Mining Lease Deed and Challenges Orders of Union and State Governments.

18 Mar 2026

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (originally ABG Cement Ltd., later Vadraj Cement Ltd.), filed a writ petition befor...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)