Search Results for "maternity benefit"

71 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 71 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Maternity Benefits Under Maternity Benefit Act 1961 -- Contractual Doctor Granted Maternity Leave Despite Municipal Corporation's Denial Based on Contractual Status

The High Court of Bombay allowed a writ petition filed by Petitioner, a contractual Assistant Professor at Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Petition filed challenging rejection of maternity leave benefits under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. Upholding women's rights and dignity in the workplace: A landmark judgment on maternity leave entitlements.

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution challenging the rejection of maternity leave benefits for Petitioner No. 2 by Respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Contractual Employee for Maternity Benefit under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on contractual basis held unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Archana Dahifale, was employed as a Project Officer on a contractual basis with the respondent No.2 Institute since 2015. Her contract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Maternity Leave for Mother Through Surrogacy Under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. The court held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 is a beneficial legislation and must be interpreted purposively to include a commissioning mother who has a child through surrogacy.

The petitioner, Dr. Hema Vijay Menon, a lecturer, lost her only son in 2010. After unsuccessful IVF attempts, she opted for surrogacy. In March 2013, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging ESI Act Applicability to Bidi Manufacturer. Definition of Factory Under Section 2(12) ESI Act Includes Premises with Power-Aided Manufacturing Process, Home Workers Are Employees.

The petitioner, M/s. Ramchand Onkarlal Agarwal, a bidi manufacturer in Kamptee, Nagpur, challenged the applicability of the Employees' State Insurance...