KAHC010142892018_1
8 Dec 2025These cross-appeals arose from the Judgment and Award dated 19.01.2018 in MVC No. 758/2015 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mysuru. The ...
Search Results for "live proximity"
225 result(s) found
Found 225 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Due to Unexplained Six-Month Delay. Detention Orders Passed Without Considering Possibility of Bail Under Section 37 of NDPS Act, 1985, Violating Doctrine of Live Proximity.
24 Mar 2025The case involved two habeas corpus petitions filed before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging p...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Under Goonda Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's bail applications and did not provide relevant documents to the detenu, violating procedural safeguards under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
16 Oct 2024The petitioner, Smt. Sangeeta Sunkrol, wife of the detenu Satish @ Market Satya, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus challenging the detention ord...
- 171
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case Due to Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Live Link. Court holds that externment order under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 must be based on objective material, show cause notice must disclose unwillingness of witnesses, and there must be proximity between crimes and initiation of proceedings.
2 Sep 2024The petitioner, Deepak Kailas Aglave, challenged the externment order dated 19.03.2024 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Parbhani, and the appe...
- 425
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders Against Family Members in Gang Case — Lack of Live Link and Proximity Between Crimes and Externment Proceedings. The court held that while family members can constitute a gang under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, the authority must demonstrate a live link between the crimes and the alleged gang activity, which was absent in this case.
2 Sep 2024The petitioners, five family members, challenged externment orders passed by the Superintendent of Police, Jalgaon, and confirmed by the Divisional Co...
- 420
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings Against Husband in Suicide Abetment Case. Petitioner Contended That Victim's Depression and Video Statement Negated Instigation, Relying on Precedents Interpreting Section 306 IPC and Section 498A IPC.
9 Aug 2024The petitioner, the husband of the deceased, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of t...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case Due to Lack of Live Link and Inordinate Delay. Order under Section 55(1) set aside as show cause notice issued over a year after last incident and no fresh crime registered during the gap.
12 Jul 2023The petitioners, Narayan Sitaram Pawar and Shantaram Narayan Pawar, challenged an externment order dated 15.12.2022 passed by the Superintendent of Po...
- 17
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rape Case, Holds Offences Under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC Form Same Transaction for Joint Trial Under Section 220 CrPC. The Court set aside the discharge of the accused for lack of territorial jurisdiction and directed trial for all offences together.
6 May 2022The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's order upholding the discharge of the accused-respondent No. 2 for the offence under Secti...
- 121
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...
- 34
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.
1 Jan 1970The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...
- 26
