Search Results for "labour dues"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "labour dues"

614 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 614 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Registrar’s Order Refusing Permission Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1970 to Sue Liquidator. Court Holds That Permission Under Section 107 is a Formality and Registrar Must Not Consider Merits of the Employees’ Wage Claim.

9 Aug 2010

The dispute arose when 83 former employees of the Amravati Growers’ Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd. sought permission under Section 107 of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Petition and Allows Employees' Petition in Part in Lock-Out Wages Dispute Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court upheld the Labour Court's direction to pay 12 months lock-out wages to former employees who had left service, but denied the claim for 20 months ex-gratia payment as not based on any existing right.

31 Aug 2012

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 27 October 2005, in an application under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Welfare Fund Cess as Unconstitutional. Levy under Maharashtra Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 held to be a fee for services rendered, not a tax, and validly imposed on establishments including those with contract labour.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Mohan Dhotre, a resident of Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the levy under the Maharashtra La...

High Court

High Court Partly Allows Municipality's Petition in Industrial Dispute by Modifying Labour Court Award - Replaces Reinstatement with Lump Sum Compensation. The Court held that considering intermittent service, illegal appointment, and lack of sanctioned posts, lump sum compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- per workman was appropriate under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, rather than reinstatement with backwages.

21 Jan 2026

The dispute originated from the termination of casual labourers employed by Padra Municipality as drainage sweepers on daily wage basis. The workmen, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part Challenging Labour Court Order Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Special Allowance and Dearness Allowance Claims Rejected for Head Office Employee Not Covered by Factory Award. The Court held that the award applied only to factory workmen and that special allowance is part of minimum wages not separately payable when total wages exceed minimum wages.

7 Feb 2017

The Petitioner, M/s. Polypharma Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing laboratory and fine chemicals with factories at Saravali and Thane and h...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Granting Back Wages to Employee Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Punishment Order Stopping Increments Does Not Deprive Employee of Full Wages for Suspension Period, Labour Court Has Jurisdiction to Compute Benefits.

27 Nov 2012

The Jain Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its CEO filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14-10-2008 passed by the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Award of Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Involved in Factory Altercation. The court held that the domestic enquiry was fair and the compensation of 30 months' wages was appropriate under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

19 Apr 2005

The petition was filed by the Rayon Workers' Union and the workman, Dinesh Pratap Singh, challenging the award of the 4th Labour Court at Thane in Ref...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Cut-off Date for Workmen Dues in Winding Up of Swadeshi Mills. Official Liquidator's Calculation Up to Appointment of Provisional Liquidator Challenged by Workmen Seeking Dues Up to Winding Up Order.

28 Oct 2013

The matter concerns a company application filed by five workmen of M/s Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd., which was wound up. The company had approximately 2970...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Overtime Award to Retired Employee Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer's Internal Circular Limiting Overtime Cannot Override Statutory Entitlement; Employer Failed to Rebut Evidence of Overtime Worked.

28 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. (MSETCL) and its officers, challenged the judgment and order dated 18.05.2022 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)