Search Results for "khatha dispute"

99 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 99 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces CAV Order in Writ Petition Against Encroachment Removal Orders Under Panchayat Raj Rules. Petitioners Alleged to Have Suppressed Material Facts and Withdrawn Civil Suit.

The Petitioners, Smt. Hombalamma and Sri Appaji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Injunction Dispute Over Possession of Properties — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Failure to Record Reasons for Dispensing with Notice Renders Ex Parte Injunction Void.

The appellant, Mr. Srinivas Adhikeshavulu Dalvai, was the defendant in a suit filed by M/s Anushka Constructions Pvt Ltd (the respondent/plaintiff) in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in BBMP Khatha Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Directing Restoration of Khatha Based on Earlier Directions. The Court held that the Joint Commissioner's order was contrary to earlier directions and the Single Judge's order was just and proper.

The appellants, Sri N. Venkatesh and Smt. D. Vijayalakshmi, filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against BBMP Order in Property Khatha Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal to Interfere with Joint Commissioner's Order Directing Restoration of Khatha Based on Earlier Civil Court Decree.

The appellants, Sri N. Venkatesh and Smt. D. Vijayalakshmi, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 03.06.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Issues Mandamus Directing Correction of Property Tax Receipt Name; Condemns Official Inaction and Imposes Costs. Writ Petition Allowed as Respondents Failed to Rectify Mistake Despite Khata Transfer and Repeated Requests, Contravening Institutional Responsibility.

The petitioner, an advocate, purchased a residential property in Bengaluru under a registered sale deed dated 10.10.2013. Subsequently, the khata was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proving the agreement and that the defendant's possession was permissive, leading to dismissal of the suit.

The appellants (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2015 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nelamangala, in O.S. No. 82/2010, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and possession dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The case involves a property dispute between Mahaboob Bi (appellant) and the legal representatives of Sharfunnisa (respondents). The appellant filed a...