Search Results for "judicial cleavage"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.

Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expenditure Tax Act Classification Between Hindu and Mappilla Undivided Families. Differential Treatment of Hindu Undivided Families and Mappilla Families Under Marumakkattayam Law is Not Discriminatory Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, 1950.

The case concerned a challenge under Article 14 of the Constitution to Section 3(1) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957. The appellant was the karta of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.

The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Regular First Appeal in Partition Suit Concerning Re-granted Walikaraki Lands Under KVOA Act. Core Issue: Junior Family Members’ Entitlement to Share in Lands Re-granted to Senior Branch After Abolition of Village Office.

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition filed by the respondents/plaintiffs against the appellants/defendants regarding agricultural lands and ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Examines Fee Reimbursement Scheme Restriction for Minority Institution Students. Court Tasked with Resolving Conflicting Precedents on Whether Limiting Reimbursement to CAP-Admitted Students Is Discriminatory.

The case concerned a challenge to a Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2013 issued by the State of Maharashtra, which restricted fee reimbursement...