WRIT PETITION NO.9189 of 2010
5 May 2011The matter arose out of a dispute over the setting up of a new private sugar factory. Khandoba Prasanna Sakhar Karkhana Limited and Sahyadri Sahakari ...
Search Results for "industrial entrepreneur memorandum"
20 result(s) found
Found 20 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court considered writ petition challenging MSME Facilitation Council award and constitutional validity of Section 16 of MSMED Act. Petitioner contended council lacked jurisdiction and award invalid due to missing signature of Chairman.
4 Oct 2021The writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between JSW Steel Ltd. (formerly Ispat Metallics India Ltd.) as petitioner and Kamlakar V. Salvi, p...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Considered Writ Petition Seeking to Quash Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum for Sugar Factory on Grounds of Distance and De-recognition Under Sugarcane Control Order, 1966. The petition asserted that IEM No. 2654/SIA/IMO/2003 stood de-recognized due to Clause 6C legal fiction and that the respondent's sugar factory at 23 km distance violated the 25 km radius notification issued under Clause 6A.
6 Jun 2025This judgment concerned a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Sahyadri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative ...
High Court
High Court of Bombay Quashes MSEFC Award for Lack of Jurisdiction Over Buyer Not Registered Under MSMED Act. Petitioner's Failure to File Objections Under Section 18(3) Does Not Confer Jurisdiction on Council When Buyer Is Not a 'Supplier' Under Section 2(n) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.
23 Sep 2025The petitioner, Dodal Electro Instruments, a proprietorship concern based in Pune, engaged in the manufacture and supply of electrical instruments, en...
- 61
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003
21 Dec 2018The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...
- 99
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.
13 Nov 2024The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...
- 423
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Grant of Alewadi Port Project to Third Party Under Maharashtra Maritime Board Policies. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Treatment and Non-Consideration of Original Proposal Contrary to Port Policies.
13 Oct 2017The dispute concerns the development of a multipurpose port at Alewadi in Maharashtra under the state's port policies. Petitioner, a UK-based private ...
- 93
High Court
High Court of Karnataka adjourns writ petition filed by employees of Bharat Electronics Limited for preliminary hearing; no final order passed. Petition seeks mandamus and certiorari based on allegations of discrimination and violation of service rules.
7 Oct 2020The writ petition was filed by 52 employees of Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), a Government of India enterprise under the Ministry of Defence. They ...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in MSMED Act Arbitration Cases on Limitation and Counterclaim Issues. The Court held that the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to arbitration proceedings under Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, and counterclaims are maintainable under Section 23(2A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, affirming the High Court's remand and arbitrator appointment orders.
29 Jun 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed two consolidated civil appeals involving arbitration proceedings under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises De...
- 256
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory — Notification Increasing Distance Not Retrospective. The court held that the Commissioner of Sugar was not required to consider factors beyond aerial distance under Clause 6-B of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.
5 Dec 2014The petitioner, a sugar factory registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated 2 July 2011 of the Commissioner of Sugar, Maharas...
- 103
