Search Results for "food security"

469 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 469 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mandatory Bodies, Emphasizes Union's Obligation Under Article 256. Non-Compliance with Welfare Legislation Leads to Summoning of Chief Secretaries for Explanation.

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed by Swaraj Abhiyan (V) concerning the non-implementation of the National Food Security Act, 2013...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Migrant Labourers in Suo Motu Writ Petition During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court ordered transportation, food provision, and withdrawal of prosecutions under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to address miseries caused by lockdown and pandemic fears.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the severe hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Food Adulteration Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedures Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Failure to Follow Section 47 and Rule 2.4.2 of the Manual of Procedures Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through a common judgment, allowed three criminal writ petitions challenging the validity of criminal proceedings...