Search Results for "finality of order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "finality of order"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Water Dispute Case, Remands to High Court for Merits. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Under Section 53 of Rajasthan Irrigation and Drainage Act, 1954 to Entertain Water Course Disputes, Subject to Restriction on Orders Affecting Growing Crops.

27 Aug 2019

The dispute arose between Madan Lal (appellant) and private respondents regarding the use and distribution of water for irrigation. The matter was ini...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case — Settlement Commission's Acceptance of Additional Income and Grant of Immunity Upheld. The Settlement Commission's order under Section 245C of Income Tax Act, 1961 is final and cannot be assailed by Revenue under Article 226 except on limited grounds.

9 Aug 2024

The Revenue filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission dated 11.03.2020...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses ESIC's Petition Challenging Exemption Notification Due to Unexplained Delay and Laches. The court held that the ESI Corporation cannot challenge a notification granting exemption under Section 87 of the ESI Act after nearly seven years, especially when the ESI Court order based on that notification was not appealed.

2 Aug 2016

The Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 23 October 2007 i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses ESIC's Challenge to Exemption Notification Due to Unexplained Delay and Laches. The Court held that the ESI Court's order granting partial relief to the establishment had attained finality and the writ petition challenging the exemption notification after six years was not maintainable.

2 Aug 2016

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a notification dated 23 October 2007 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order on Building Proposal Validity — Held That Commissioner's Decision Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Is Final and Not Subject to Judicial Review on Merits.

11 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s Mahendra Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Revision Order in Land Record Dispute — Restoration of Revenue Entries Directed. The Court held that the Minister exceeded jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 by entertaining a revision against an order that had attained finality.

22 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Rama s/o Gunda Malkapure, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order dated 06.06.2017 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Challenging Confiscation of Cash Under NDPS Act Due to Suppression of Appeal and Finality of Order. The court held that the petitioner's failure to disclose the filing of an appeal under Section 63(3) of the NDPS Act, which was subsequently dismissed, rendered the confiscation order final and the writ petition not maintainable.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Mohd. Aslam Khan Sanaulla, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to set aside an order confiscating cash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Surplus Land Declaration Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner Failed to Appeal Tribunal Order Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Within Reasonable Time.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Bhayyasaheb Babasaheb Aher, a resident of Umapur, Taluka Georai, District Beed, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)