Search Results for "expulsion without provision"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Leave India Notice by Australian Employee over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and FRRO's Jurisdiction. Employment Visa Grant by High Commission Not Subject to FRRO's Nullification, Argues Petitioner.

The writ petition was filed by an Australian citizen, who held an Employment Visa (E-2) valid from 08.01.2018 to 07.01.2020, after being appointed as ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of MLC for Unparliamentary Conduct and Defiance of Ethics Committee — Principles of Natural Justice Not Violated as Petitioner Waived Right to be Heard by Repeatedly Avoiding Proceedings and Challenging Committee's Authority.

The petitioner, a Member of the Bihar Legislative Council (MLC) from the Rashtriya Janata Dal, challenged his expulsion from the Council based on a re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Student's Challenge to Expulsion for Sexual Harassment — Procedural Defects Cured by Appeal Process. Expulsion Upheld as Proportionate Under UGC Regulations 2015 for Repeated Misconduct Despite Humanitarian Considerations.

The petitioner, a student of Maharashtra National Law University (MNLU), was expelled after an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) found him guilty of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Registrar's Refusal to Record Change in Partnership Constitution Following Expulsion of Partners. Registrar of Firms Directed to Consider Application on Merits Under Section 63 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The petitioner, Samrat Span Realties, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Expulsion of Founder Member from Cooperative Housing Society. Membership Cancellation Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Upheld as Valid and in Accordance with Bye-Laws and Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Uttam Jagannath Lungare, a founder member of the Gurujan Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. (respondent No. 5), challenged his expulsion...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Dispute Under Section 91 of MCS Act Maintainable Against Expulsion Under Section 35. Cooperative Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Validity of Expulsion Resolution, Remedy Under Section 91 Not Barred by Section 35 Appeal.

The appellant, a member of the respondent housing society, filed a dispute under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Expulsion of Club Member — Expulsion Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Natural Justice. Member's Defamatory Conduct and Misconduct Justified Expulsion Under Club Bye-laws.

The Plaintiff, Jaisingh Choraria, a member of The National Sports Club of India since 1989, filed a suit challenging his expulsion from the Club. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Appellant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The appellant, Ravi Kiran Aggarwal, filed an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the order of the City Ci...