Search Results for "dumper not motor vehicle"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Registration Requirement for Off-Highway Construction Equipment Vehicles. Vehicles Designed Exclusively for Off-Highway Use in Mines Not Required to Be Registered Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Manikgarh Cement, a division of Century Textiles and Industries Limited, challenged a notice dated 18.10.2003 and order dated 24.11.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Registration of Off-Highway Mining Vehicles as Motor Vehicles. Vehicles Designed Exclusively for Off-Highway Use Not Required to Be Registered Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Manikgarh Cement, a division of Century Textiles and Industries Limited, challenged a notice dated 18.10.2003 and order dated 24.11.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Appeals by Original Respondent No.3 Employer Against Motor Accident Claim Tribunal Awards. Appeals challenge Tribunal's apportionment of 50% liability on employer for collision between mining Dumper and Tata Sumo under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

These first appeals arose from judgments dated 29.06.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal-3, Nagpur in Claim Petitions Nos. 671 and 672 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Illegal Seizure of Vehicles Without Due Process. Authorities directed to release dumpers/tippers seized without following procedure under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in construction business and its partners, owned two dumpers/tippers (registration Nos. MH-04-CP-0308 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MACT Award in Motor Accident Claim Despite Insurance Company's Breach of Policy Conditions Defense. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation to Third Party Victims with Right to Recover from Owner Under Section 149 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 5th May 2003, when a Dumper knocked down Farida Shabbir, who was proceeding on her scooter, res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim Without Considering Contributory Negligence. Stationary Vehicle Parked on Public Road Attracts Liability; Case Remanded for Fresh Assessment of Negligence Apportionment.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the appellants (claimants) being the widow and another legal heir of deceased Maheshbhai Parmar. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Appeal by Steel Authority of India Ltd. Against Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Employer's Vicarious Liability for Employee's Negligent Driving Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the respondents, the widow, children, and mother of deceased Vijay Sonone. On 22.12.1998, at abou...