Search Results for "dog squad identification"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 395, 397 IPC. The Court Examines the Identification of Accused in a Dacoity Case Where No Test Identification Parade Was Conducted.

Background: This criminal appeal arose from a judgment of the IIIrd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 63 of 2004, convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Identification of accused by witnesses was not reliable as they were not known to the witnesses prior to the incident and no test identification parade was conducted.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Bhaskar Zumbar Kale, Narya alias Narayan Umrao Pawar, and Jalindar Shivaji Karanjkar against their con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Set Aside as Motive, Last Seen, Recovery Evidence and Dog Tracking Held Unreliable, Failing to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.

This appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, a 24-year-old villager, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 201 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellants, Jafar Khijar Sheikh and Sumit Appa @ Prakash Gawali, were convicted by the District Judge-10 and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Dacoity with Murder Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Dacoity Under Section 396 IPC. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Property Under Section 412 IPC.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code against a common judgment and order of conviction and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Housebreaking and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 457 and 380 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The petitioner, Thippeswamy @ Kunta Thippaga, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Challakere in C.C.No.898/2010 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Criminal Appeals Concerning Dacoity Conviction Under IPC 395, 397 and Arms Act; Outcome Undetermined Due to Incomplete Text. The Court Analyzed Evidence on Identification, Recovery, and Acquittal Appeals but Final Decision Not Provided.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals arising from the same judgment and order dated 10th April 2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge...