Search Results for "detenue statement"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Consideration of Vital Documents. Detaining Authority's Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated Due to Failure to Place Exhibits Before It.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Rashid Ahmed Siddique, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Retracted Statement Not Considered. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Retraction of Confession.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Iqbal Yusuf Suleman, challenged the detention order dated 20.4.2004 passed by the detaining authority under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Abdulla Gulam Mustafa, challenged a detention order dated 27.11.2003 issued by the Principal Secretary (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Public Order Disturbance. Detenu's Preventive Detention as Dangerous Person Set Aside as In-Camera Statements Were Not Properly Considered and Bail/Notice Under Section 41-A CrPC Were Ignored.

The petitioner, Atahar Khan Amir Khan, a detenu, challenged the detention order dated 29.08.2022 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Akol...