Search Results for "demand and acceptance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "demand and acceptance"

1872 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1872 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Trustworthy Evidence and Applicable Presumption. The Court Held That Minor Discrepancies in Witness Testimony Do Not Vitiate Prosecution When Core Facts of Demand and Acceptance Are Established Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) Read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Apr 2025

The present criminal appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 09.03.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Dharwad in Crimin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Demand and acceptance of illegal gratification proved through shadow witness testimony and recovery of bribe money, satisfying the sine qua non requirement under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

17 Mar 2023

The case involved an appeal against conviction of a public servant for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, an Inspec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Illegal Gratification. Conviction Overturned as Proof of Demand is a Sine Qua Non Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and Mere Recovery of Money Without Evidence of Demand is Insufficient to Sustain Guilt.

23 Mar 2023

The appeal involved a challenge to the appellant's conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, a cleaner in the office of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Unproven Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. The prosecution failed to establish foundational facts of demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as key witnesses were not examined and recordings were inaudible.

25 Mar 2014

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, where the accused, an Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, was alleg...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Despite Minor Contradictions in Witness Testimony. The court held that minor discrepancies in the testimonies of complainant and panch witness regarding the place of payment and hand-wash do not vitiate the conviction when the core evidence of demand, acceptance, and recovery is consistent.

27 Nov 2019

The appellant, Vinod Kumar Garg, a public servant working with the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (DESU), was convicted under Sections 7 and 13 of ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Jan 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

21 Jan 2026

The appellant, Yadav Rajbahadur Ghyansingh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Sales Tax Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Jan 2026

The appellant, Manilal Bhikhabhai Makwana, was a Sales Tax Officer in Ahmedabad. The complainant, Himanshu Jayantibhai Patel, was a honey trader. The ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d)(i)(ii)(iii) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as decoy witness turned hostile and prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

21 Jan 2026

The appellant, Pravinbhai Ambalal Shah, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Special Case No. 5 ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Evidence and Invalid Sanction. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

29 Jan 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)