WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019
20 Nov 2019The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....
Search Results for "deficit recovery"
199 result(s) found
Found 199 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Specific Performance — Order Allowing Deficit Court Fee Held Interlocutory. Revision under Section 115 CPC Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Order That Does Not Finally Determine Rights.
15 Jul 2014The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the defendants (petitioners) challenging the order of the 31st Additional City Civil Judge, Banga...
- 34
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Civil Revision Petition and Quashes Trial Court Order Accepting Deficit Court Fee After Two-Year Delay. Trial Court Erred in Exercising Discretion Under Section 149 CPC Without Proper Application of Mind and Beyond Statutory Time Limits Under Section 148 CPC, Rendering Suit Stillborn.
18 Feb 2026The dispute arose from a civil revision petition filed by defendants challenging the Trial Court's order accepting deficit court fee payment after two...
- 244
Tribunals
NCLAT Allows Section 7 Petition in Insolvency Case Due to Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets and Emails. Repeated acknowledgment of debt by Corporate Debtor in balance sheets and emails extends limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, saving the petition from being time-barred.
3 Jul 2025The case involves an appeal filed by Akzo Nobel India Ltd. (Financial Creditor) against Stan Cars Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the...
- 147
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Case — Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in DRT's Refusal to Set Aside Auction Sale. Court Held That DRT's Order Was Not Without Jurisdiction and That the Petitioner Had an Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act.
19 Aug 2016The petitioner, Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, acting as trustee of Arcil-SBPS-024-I Trust, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...
- 177
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Retired Professor's Writ Petition for Interest on Delayed Pension and DCRG Payments. Recovery of amounts from pension and DCRG without notice held illegal under Article 300A of the Constitution of India.
1 Sep 2017The petitioner, Sri F.J.M. Crasta, a retired Professor in Physics from St. Aloysius College, Mangalore, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Deficit Stamp Duty Demand — Limitation Period Under Section 32-A(1) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Is Mandatory. Demand for deficit stamp duty and penalty made after 5 years from execution of instrument is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.
30 Jun 2020The petitioner, Meena Shyam Tulsani, purchased a commercial office premises admeasuring 351 sq.ft super built up area in 1999 through a notarized agre...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Port Trust for Recovery of Port Charges Due to Failure to Prove Auction Sale Date. Claim for Rs.1,14,057 Barred by Limitation as Evidence of Sale on 14th September 1981 was Inconsistent and Not Supported by Notice.
6 Jan 2010The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,14,057.24 with inter...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Port Trust's Petition to Recover Demurrage Charges After Auction of Goods Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The court held that the Port Trust's right to recover demurrage charges is not extinguished by the auction of goods under Section 61 of the Act, and the consignee remains liable for the shortfall.
25 Aug 2005The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay (petitioner) filed a suit against Taparia Tools Limited (respondent) for recovery of demurrage charges amo...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Appeal for Default in Payment of Court Fees - Restoration of Appeal Ordered. The court held that dismissal for default in payment of deficit court fees was perverse and directed restoration of the appeal on merits, emphasizing a liberal approach to ensure justice.
7 Dec 2022The petitioner, ICICI Bank Limited, filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated December ...
- 63
